If IPv4 were land
395 comments
- Points222
- Comments291
395 comments
Story details from Hacker News ↗ · linked article on iptrust.co.
If IPv4 were land was first seen on Hacker News · Front page on Oct 29, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 78 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #6 of 30, reached on Oct 30, 06:22 UTC. It is #6 right now, holding steady at #6 over the last 6 checks.
Position on Hacker News · Front page at every check (lower is better).
Best rank per day (UTC).
points as reported by Hacker News.
A few top-level comments from Hacker News, shortened. Read the full thread on Hacker News.
India: 47M China: 358M Both countries have roughly the same population. The IPv4 problem has been swept under the rug with CGNAT and a normal person doesn't even notice it. But it sucks. Forget having a dedicated IP, even on a broadband connection, you don't get a public IP that's truly yours. According to IPInfo[1],…
From a Georgist perspective, IPv4 is actually a form of land (it's a finite "natural resource", although that's not quite proper), and you could make a case for "land rent" being taxed on the addresses. This is the same as radio broadcast frequencies, web addresses, actual land, un-mined gold/oil/coal/whatever, and…
The only thing that surprised me was that Canada was so small compared to other Western countries. But I suppose that might be an artifact. The map shows IPv4 proportional to land area, but a "fair" allocation would have IPv4 proportionate to population, not land area, and I'd assume Canada is (overall) less densely…
Yes. As of Oct 30, 09:07 UTC it is #6, holding steady at #6 over the last 6 checks.
#6 on Hacker News · Front page, on Oct 30, 06:22 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 15 minutes.
It was first seen on Oct 29, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (78 checks) since.
222 points and 291 comments; submitted by rokostik on Oct 29, 2026.