Moving our warehouse off DuckDB
6 comments
- Points33
- Comments7
6 comments
Story details from Hacker News ↗ · linked article on posthog.com.
Moving our warehouse off DuckDB was first seen on Hacker News · Front page on Nov 2, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 38 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #9 of 30, reached on Nov 3, 00:37 UTC. It dropped off the list after Nov 3, 02:22 UTC. The same link also trended on Lobsters, which raises its cross-platform score.
Position on Hacker News · Front page at every check (lower is better).
Best rank per day (UTC).
Platform metric as reported by Hacker News.
| List | Best | Days | Checks | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hacker News · Front page | #9 | 2 | 38 | |
| LLobsters · Hottest Why we're moving our warehouse off DuckDB | same link | |||
A few top-level comments from Hacker News, shortened. Read the full thread on Hacker News.
> Five months ago, we rebuilt our warehouse [1] on DuckDB instead of ClickHouse. Why did they write this post if they had not even allowed things to settle. It sounds like someone wanted to claim victory (and promo?) https://posthog.com/blog/why-we-rebuilt-our-data-warehouse
Am I missing something here, or is the only technical detail in the post "a trillion rows is a lot of data, maybe trying trinio will work this time"? It feels like a lot of churn and not a lot of measurements or engineering.
Haven't seen Posthog's website in a while. Man, it's hideous.
Archived daily, weekly and monthly lists that include this entry.
Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Nov 3, 02:22 UTC, after 2 days of trending.
#9 on Hacker News · Front page, on Nov 3, 00:37 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 15 minutes.
It was first seen on Nov 2, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (38 checks) since.
33 points and 7 comments; submitted by emschwartz on Nov 2, 2026.