Trendoday

Can GROUP BY still be optimized after all these years?

0 comments

  • Points93
  • Comments15
–Rank now
#15Peak rank
1Days on list
126Score · 7d
Nov 7, 2026First seen
Rank · 7 days

On Hacker News

Points
93
Comments
15
Submitted by
ntur1337
Posted
Nov 3, 2026
Site
pivotlake.io

Story details from Hacker News ↗ · linked article on pivotlake.io.

Trending history

Can GROUP BY still be optimized after all these years? was first seen on Hacker News · Front page on Nov 7, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 67 checks on 1 different day. Its best position was #15 of 30, reached on Nov 7, 05:52 UTC. It dropped off the list after Nov 7, 16:39 UTC.

Rank history

Position on Hacker News · Front page at every check (lower is better).

#1#11#20#30 00:2204:2608:3012:3516:39 Nov 7, 00:22 UTC · #29Nov 7, 00:37 UTC · #29Nov 7, 00:52 UTC · #28Nov 7, 01:07 UTC · #28Nov 7, 01:22 UTC · #27Nov 7, 01:37 UTC · #26Nov 7, 01:52 UTC · #24Nov 7, 02:07 UTC · #25Nov 7, 02:22 UTC · #23Nov 7, 02:37 UTC · #22Nov 7, 02:52 UTC · #21Nov 7, 03:07 UTC · #20Nov 7, 03:22 UTC · #21Nov 7, 03:37 UTC · #21Nov 7, 03:52 UTC · #17Nov 7, 04:07 UTC · #18Nov 7, 04:22 UTC · #19Nov 7, 04:37 UTC · #19Nov 7, 04:52 UTC · #18Nov 7, 05:07 UTC · #17Nov 7, 05:22 UTC · #18Nov 7, 05:37 UTC · #16Nov 7, 05:52 UTC · #15Nov 7, 06:07 UTC · #15Nov 7, 06:22 UTC · #16Nov 7, 06:37 UTC · #17Nov 7, 06:52 UTC · #16Nov 7, 07:07 UTC · #17Nov 7, 07:22 UTC · #17Nov 7, 07:37 UTC · #18Nov 7, 07:52 UTC · #18Nov 7, 08:07 UTC · #19Nov 7, 08:22 UTC · #19Nov 7, 08:37 UTC · #20Nov 7, 08:52 UTC · #18Nov 7, 09:07 UTC · #19Nov 7, 09:22 UTC · #19Nov 7, 09:37 UTC · #19Nov 7, 09:52 UTC · #18Nov 7, 10:07 UTC · #18Nov 7, 10:22 UTC · #18Nov 7, 10:37 UTC · #18Nov 7, 10:52 UTC · #17Nov 7, 11:07 UTC · #18Nov 7, 11:22 UTC · #18Nov 7, 11:37 UTC · #17Nov 7, 11:52 UTC · #18Nov 7, 12:07 UTC · #18Nov 7, 12:22 UTC · #18Nov 7, 12:37 UTC · #18Nov 7, 12:52 UTC · #19Nov 7, 13:07 UTC · #18Nov 7, 13:09 UTC · #18Nov 7, 13:24 UTC · #18Nov 7, 13:39 UTC · #18Nov 7, 13:54 UTC · #17Nov 7, 14:09 UTC · #17Nov 7, 14:24 UTC · #19Nov 7, 14:39 UTC · #17Nov 7, 14:54 UTC · #17Nov 7, 15:09 UTC · #17Nov 7, 15:24 UTC · #17Nov 7, 15:39 UTC · #18Nov 7, 15:54 UTC · #16Nov 7, 16:09 UTC · #16Nov 7, 16:24 UTC · #15Nov 7, 16:39 UTC · #16

Last 14 days

Best rank per day (UTC).

Oct 26today

Metric history

Platform metric as reported by Hacker News.

03774112 00:2204:2608:3012:3516:39 Nov 7, 00:22 UTC · 5Nov 7, 00:37 UTC · 7Nov 7, 00:52 UTC · 11Nov 7, 01:07 UTC · 16Nov 7, 01:22 UTC · 21Nov 7, 01:37 UTC · 23Nov 7, 01:52 UTC · 27Nov 7, 02:07 UTC · 37Nov 7, 02:22 UTC · 42Nov 7, 02:37 UTC · 46Nov 7, 02:52 UTC · 47Nov 7, 03:07 UTC · 49Nov 7, 03:22 UTC · 49Nov 7, 03:37 UTC · 51Nov 7, 03:52 UTC · 51Nov 7, 04:07 UTC · 54Nov 7, 04:22 UTC · 55Nov 7, 04:37 UTC · 58Nov 7, 04:52 UTC · 59Nov 7, 05:07 UTC · 61Nov 7, 05:22 UTC · 62Nov 7, 05:37 UTC · 62Nov 7, 05:52 UTC · 62Nov 7, 06:07 UTC · 62Nov 7, 06:22 UTC · 63Nov 7, 06:37 UTC · 66Nov 7, 06:52 UTC · 69Nov 7, 07:07 UTC · 71Nov 7, 07:22 UTC · 73Nov 7, 07:37 UTC · 73Nov 7, 07:52 UTC · 74Nov 7, 08:07 UTC · 76Nov 7, 08:22 UTC · 77Nov 7, 08:37 UTC · 78Nov 7, 08:52 UTC · 78Nov 7, 09:07 UTC · 79Nov 7, 09:22 UTC · 79Nov 7, 09:37 UTC · 79Nov 7, 09:52 UTC · 79Nov 7, 10:07 UTC · 79Nov 7, 10:22 UTC · 80Nov 7, 10:37 UTC · 84Nov 7, 10:52 UTC · 85Nov 7, 11:07 UTC · 89Nov 7, 11:22 UTC · 90Nov 7, 11:37 UTC · 90Nov 7, 11:52 UTC · 91Nov 7, 12:07 UTC · 93Nov 7, 12:22 UTC · 93Nov 7, 12:37 UTC · 93Nov 7, 12:52 UTC · 93Nov 7, 13:07 UTC · 95Nov 7, 13:09 UTC · 95Nov 7, 13:24 UTC · 95Nov 7, 13:39 UTC · 95Nov 7, 13:54 UTC · 95Nov 7, 14:09 UTC · 96Nov 7, 14:24 UTC · 96Nov 7, 14:39 UTC · 97Nov 7, 14:54 UTC · 99Nov 7, 15:09 UTC · 100Nov 7, 15:24 UTC · 101Nov 7, 15:39 UTC · 103Nov 7, 15:54 UTC · 107Nov 7, 16:09 UTC · 109Nov 7, 16:24 UTC · 111Nov 7, 16:39 UTC · 112

From the discussion

A few top-level comments from Hacker News, shortened. Read the full thread on Hacker News.

I wonder why you didn't opt to perform a Top-K aggregation in each partition in parallel. That would give you both a reduction of elements in each partition and also the correct maximum of each partition, which can be used for further pruning.

Their clickbench results look really good. https://benchmark.clickhouse.com/#system=+liH|Hoaus|DcD|ucqs...

Neat! For others, the data structure they are describing is a count-min sketch. It looks like they're using it to set a bound on elements that can enter the group-by and using it to skip a bunch of extra work

Questions

Is Can GROUP BY still be optimized after all these years? trending on Hacker News right now?

Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Nov 7, 16:39 UTC, after 1 day of trending.

What is the highest rank Can GROUP BY still be optimized after all these years? reached?

#15 on Hacker News · Front page, on Nov 7, 05:52 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 15 minutes.

How long has Can GROUP BY still be optimized after all these years? been trending?

It was first seen on Nov 7, 2026 and has been on the list on 1 day (67 checks) since.

How much discussion did it get on Hacker News?

93 points and 15 comments; submitted by ntur1337 on Nov 3, 2026.