GitHub's new Git storage architecture
0 comments
- Points154
- Comments34
0 comments
Story details from Hacker News ↗ · linked article on github.blog.
GitHub's new Git storage architecture was first seen on Hacker News · Front page on Nov 6, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 72 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #9 of 30, reached on Nov 7, 16:54 UTC. It dropped off the list after Nov 7, 17:24 UTC. The same link also trended on Lobsters, which raises its cross-platform score.
Position on Hacker News · Front page at every check (lower is better).
Best rank per day (UTC).
Platform metric as reported by Hacker News.
| List | Best | Days | Checks | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hacker News · Front page | #9 | 2 | 72 | |
| LLobsters · Hottest Inside GitHub's new Git storage architecture | same link | |||
A few top-level comments from Hacker News, shortened. Read the full thread on Hacker News.
If I'm reading this right, this is (really solid) future planning but won't help with the current outages? I'd have thought so from the headline + initial content but then they say that the horizontal scale techniques are basically carrying over from the existing architecture (where it seems the problem is?) and this…
This looks a lot like Cursor's Continuity, though Github are reporting an order of magnitude greater write throughput. https://cursor.com/blog/git-at-any-scale
Most of this is similar to what https://enroute.sh already did scaling Git. https://enroute.sh/blog/everyone-is-doing-git-on-s3-wrong
Archived daily, weekly and monthly lists that include this entry.
Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Nov 7, 17:24 UTC, after 2 days of trending.
#9 on Hacker News · Front page, on Nov 7, 16:54 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 15 minutes.
It was first seen on Nov 6, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (72 checks) since.
154 points and 34 comments; submitted by DAlperin on Nov 6, 2026.