This is not sustainable
33 comments · security
- Comments32
#7Rank now 1
#1Peak rank
2Days on list
377Score · 7d
Oct 28, 2026First seen
Rank · 7 days
On Lobsters
security
- Score
- 132
- Comments
- 32
- Submitted by
- binjip978
- Tags
- security
- Site
- netmeister.org
Story details from Lobsters ↗ · linked article on netmeister.org.
Trending history
This is not sustainable was first seen on Lobsters · Hottest on Oct 28, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 61 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #1 of 25, reached on Oct 28, 10:19 UTC. It is #7 right now, slipping from #5 to #7 over the last 6 checks.
Rank history
Position on Lobsters · Hottest at every check (lower is better).
Last 14 days
Best rank per day (UTC).
1
3
Oct 16today
Metric history
▲ as reported by Lobsters.
From the discussion
A few top-level comments from Lobsters, shortened. Read the full thread on Lobsters.
> Oh, you have a detailed package inventory or, dare I say it, SBOMs? That's really nice. Do show me where that lists the various [vendored or hard-coded CA trust bundles](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/576475). Yeah, I didn't think so.3 Interesting the Author linked to nixos issue here, if you follow that…
ISTM that the right way to deal with automated vuln discovery in big complex stacks is to replace the big complex stacks with smaller simpler stacks, accepting that this will often mean significant loss of functionality. And keep repeating that until some minimal threshold is reached, of tools so simple that they can…
Questions
Is This is not sustainable trending on Lobsters right now?
Yes. As of Oct 29, 10:19 UTC it is #7, slipping from #5 to #7 over the last 6 checks.
What is the highest rank This is not sustainable reached?
#1 on Lobsters · Hottest, on Oct 28, 10:19 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 30 minutes.
How long has This is not sustainable been trending?
It was first seen on Oct 28, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (61 checks) since.