Defending the patch gap against automated attackers
0 comments · browsers, security
- Comments3
0 comments · browsers, security
Story details from Lobsters ↗ · linked article on blog.mozilla.org.
Defending the patch gap against automated attackers was first seen on Lobsters · Hottest on Oct 30, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 39 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #15 of 25, reached on Oct 31, 09:51 UTC. It dropped off the list after Oct 31, 17:51 UTC.
Position on Lobsters · Hottest at every check (lower is better).
Best rank per day (UTC).
Platform metric as reported by Lobsters.
A few top-level comments from Lobsters, shortened. Read the full thread on Lobsters.
This should probably be read in the context of [this article](https://epoch.ai/publications/open-weight-models-patch-gap) (especially the otherwise surprising references to GLM 3.5 specifically rather than models generally). Money quote: > In our experiments, GLM 5.3 used this gap to build a webpage that, when…
And a literal money quote: > Our total research spend targeting Firefox exceeded $100,000 in API costs, including experimentation to build a realistic offline environment and our preliminary testing. However, once we developed our harness and pointed GLM 5.3 in the right direction, exploiting the browser became cheap…
Archived daily, weekly and monthly lists that include this entry.
Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Oct 31, 17:51 UTC, after 2 days of trending.
#15 on Lobsters · Hottest, on Oct 31, 09:51 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 30 minutes.
It was first seen on Oct 30, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (39 checks) since.