Optimizing ClickHouse for Intel's ultra-high core count processors
1 comments · databases, performance
- Comments1
–Rank now
#11Peak rank
1Days on list
–Score · 7d
Oct 30, 2026First seen
On Lobsters
databasesperformance
- Score
- 7
- Comments
- 1
- Submitted by
- knl
- Tags
- databases, performance
- Site
- clickhouse.com
Story details from Lobsters ↗ · linked article on clickhouse.com.
Trending history
Optimizing ClickHouse for Intel's ultra-high core count processors was first seen on Lobsters · Hottest on Oct 30, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 1 check on 1 different day. Its best position was #11 of 25, reached on Oct 30, 10:19 UTC. It dropped off the list after Oct 30, 10:19 UTC.
Rank history
Position on Lobsters · Hottest at every check (lower is better).
Last 14 days
Best rank per day (UTC).
11
Oct 26today
From the discussion
A few top-level comments from Lobsters, shortened. Read the full thread on Lobsters.
The optimizations are interesting, but the takeaway here for me is that they didn't need to do them until now. Even a seemingly basic mutex contention issue: it didn't really bite them until they ran with two hundred cores. Perhaps I need to worry about those things a little less.
Featured in
Archived daily, weekly and monthly lists that include this entry.
Lobsters 1 day, best #11
Questions
Is Optimizing ClickHouse for Intel's ultra-high core count processors trending on Lobsters right now?
Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Oct 30, 10:19 UTC, after 1 day of trending.
What is the highest rank Optimizing ClickHouse for Intel's ultra-high core count processors reached?
#11 on Lobsters · Hottest, on Oct 30, 10:19 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 30 minutes.
How long has Optimizing ClickHouse for Intel's ultra-high core count processors been trending?
It was first seen on Oct 30, 2026 and has been on the list on 1 day (1 check) since.