The Web Can't Afford a JavaScript Runtime Monoculture
0 comments · javascript
- Comments14
0 comments · javascript
Story details from Lobsters ↗ · linked article on redmonk.com.
The Web Can't Afford a JavaScript Runtime Monoculture was first seen on Lobsters · Hottest on Oct 29, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 53 checks on 4 different days. Its best position was #6 of 25, reached on Nov 1, 03:21 UTC. It dropped off the list after Nov 2, 02:51 UTC.
Position on Lobsters · Hottest at every check (lower is better).
Best rank per day (UTC).
Platform metric as reported by Lobsters.
A few top-level comments from Lobsters, shortened. Read the full thread on Lobsters.
I think this argument makes way more sense on the client (browser) side, not server side. Is the “web” broadly speaking defined by the set of JS runtimes we can deploy on the backend? Maybe I’m biased since JS is one of the last languages I want to use server side, if at all. The issues of standards control client…
> Apple built Safari on an open-source engine called WebKit Nope, WebKit is Apple's fork that underlies Safari. The origin was [KHTML](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHTML).
Have Deno/Bun ever gained enough traction for Node not to be considered a monoculture?
Archived daily, weekly and monthly lists that include this entry.
Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Nov 2, 02:51 UTC, after 4 days of trending.
#6 on Lobsters · Hottest, on Nov 1, 03:21 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 30 minutes.
It was first seen on Oct 29, 2026 and has been on the list on 4 days (53 checks) since.