Trendoday

DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than 5 W

1 comments

  • Points14
  • Comments2
–Rank now
#14Peak rank
2Days on list
91Score · 7d
Nov 9, 2026First seen
Rank · 7 days

On Hacker News

Points
14
Comments
2
Submitted by
giuliomagnifico
Posted
Nov 9, 2026
Site
eetimes.com

Story details from Hacker News ↗ · linked article on eetimes.com.

Trending history

DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than 5 W was first seen on Hacker News · Front page on Nov 9, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 24 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #14 of 30, reached on Nov 9, 22:24 UTC. It dropped off the list after Nov 10, 00:54 UTC. The same link also trended on Lobsters, which raises its cross-platform score.

Rank history

Position on Hacker News · Front page at every check (lower is better).

#1#11#20#30 19:0920:3522:0123:2800:54 Nov 9, 19:09 UTC · #27Nov 9, 19:24 UTC · #26Nov 9, 19:39 UTC · #22Nov 9, 19:54 UTC · #21Nov 9, 20:09 UTC · #17Nov 9, 20:24 UTC · #15Nov 9, 20:39 UTC · #15Nov 9, 20:54 UTC · #15Nov 9, 21:09 UTC · #17Nov 9, 21:24 UTC · #16Nov 9, 21:39 UTC · #16Nov 9, 21:54 UTC · #15Nov 9, 22:09 UTC · #15Nov 9, 22:24 UTC · #14Nov 9, 22:39 UTC · #14Nov 9, 22:54 UTC · #14Nov 9, 23:09 UTC · #14Nov 9, 23:24 UTC · #15Nov 9, 23:39 UTC · #15Nov 9, 23:54 UTC · #14Nov 10, 00:09 UTC · #15Nov 10, 00:24 UTC · #15Nov 10, 00:39 UTC · #15Nov 10, 00:54 UTC · #15

Last 14 days

Best rank per day (UTC).

Oct 28today

Metric history

Platform metric as reported by Hacker News.

04590136 19:0920:3522:0123:2800:54 Nov 9, 19:09 UTC · 7Nov 9, 19:24 UTC · 11Nov 9, 19:39 UTC · 25Nov 9, 19:54 UTC · 40Nov 9, 20:09 UTC · 57Nov 9, 20:24 UTC · 73Nov 9, 20:39 UTC · 82Nov 9, 20:54 UTC · 90Nov 9, 21:09 UTC · 92Nov 9, 21:24 UTC · 97Nov 9, 21:39 UTC · 104Nov 9, 21:54 UTC · 110Nov 9, 22:09 UTC · 113Nov 9, 22:24 UTC · 115Nov 9, 22:39 UTC · 117Nov 9, 22:54 UTC · 119Nov 9, 23:09 UTC · 122Nov 9, 23:24 UTC · 123Nov 9, 23:39 UTC · 126Nov 9, 23:54 UTC · 130Nov 10, 00:09 UTC · 135Nov 10, 00:24 UTC · 136Nov 10, 00:39 UTC · 136Nov 10, 00:54 UTC · 136

Where it trended

From the discussion

A few top-level comments from Hacker News, shortened. Read the full thread on Hacker News.

Quirks from the article: 1) The performance numbers are simulated 2) The details say that the performance numbers require 2.7x the overall power, so around 13.5W. Power needed for all the memory is not explicit in the numbers. 3) The compiler is also simulated and it's a prototype, so it's not a drop-in replacement…

Wonder how it would feel because the details shown seems a bit slow to edge device use

Questions

Is DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than 5 W trending on Hacker News right now?

Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Nov 10, 00:54 UTC, after 2 days of trending.

What is the highest rank DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than 5 W reached?

#14 on Hacker News · Front page, on Nov 9, 22:24 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 15 minutes.

How long has DeepX claims inference up to 100B parameters at less than 5 W been trending?

It was first seen on Nov 9, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (24 checks) since.

How much discussion did it get on Hacker News?

14 points and 2 comments; submitted by giuliomagnifico on Nov 9, 2026.