November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial Analysis, Highest So Far
0 comments
- Points346
- Comments247
0 comments
Story details from Hacker News ↗ · linked article on artificialanalysis.ai.
November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial Analysis, Highest So Far was first seen on Hacker News · Front page on Nov 9, 2026. Since then it has appeared in 50 checks on 2 different days. Its best position was #5 of 30, reached on Nov 10, 02:24 UTC. It dropped off the list after Nov 10, 10:39 UTC.
Position on Hacker News · Front page at every check (lower is better).
Best rank per day (UTC).
Platform metric as reported by Hacker News.
A few top-level comments from Hacker News, shortened. Read the full thread on Hacker News.
Forget about the scores... look at the Cost Per Task. Fable 5.1 was already the most expensive by a good margin, and now Fable 5.2 doubles it! This is with the price cut. The output tokens per task just exploded. From 118k tokens (46k Answer/71k Reasoning) in 5.1 to 274k tokens (81k Answer/192k Reasoning) in 5.2.
Cool! It looks like Fable 5.2 (especially low and medium) also sit on the pareto frontier between time per task and intelligence: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?speed=output-speed-over... I am always interested in this comparison since it shows how quickly you can go back and forth with a model, capturing both…
It's crazy how expensive Anthropic's model is compared to pretty capable DeepSeek-Flash While they made, hands down, the best models, their 100x price for few percent better is completely made up, and I think it will end up bad for them
Archived daily, weekly and monthly lists that include this entry.
Not at the moment. It was last on the list on Nov 10, 10:39 UTC, after 2 days of trending.
#5 on Hacker News · Front page, on Nov 10, 02:24 UTC. Trendoday checks this list every 15 minutes.
It was first seen on Nov 9, 2026 and has been on the list on 2 days (50 checks) since.
346 points and 247 comments; submitted by theanonymousone on Nov 9, 2026.